Comments on: PlayStation 3 vs. XBox 360: Which one is Better

By: dupe dupe

dupe dupe — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:25:27 +0000

It’s to bad that the PSN sucks. Xbox Live is a million times better than the playstation version. If they didn’t give the service away for free nobody would use it. As it is, there are millions more XBL users.

I also noticed that the people that play on the playstation version aren’t as good. In call of duty I have like a 3 to 1 kill ratio on sony but on xbox it’s more like 1.5 to 1. It’s not that I’m worse on one system versus the other it’s that the players aren’t as skilled.

If I want to play a game I want to be challenged, not play against a bunch of noobs.

Also, who cares about a blue ray player. I’ve owned systems for 10 years and never watched a DVD on my console. I bought it to play games.

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:49:35 +0000

360 doesn’t have better memory. It has 512MB shared ram running at 700mhz. The PS3 has 256MB ram running the GPU at 700mhz, & 256MB ram running the cell at 3.2GHZ. It may be slightly more flexible having all of your ram shared, but when the CPU RAM on the PS3 runs at over 4 times the speed of the ram on the 360 that’s got to help matters somewhat, & we all know that the GPU is the PS3’s weak point, & the cell is it’s strong point.

By: drtymoney

drtymoney — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:29:55 +0000

I get every game informer that comes out i have been a huge xbox fan from the beginning but ever since ive been geting the new game informers since about 4months ago ive decited to switch over to ps3 ill give you one good reason in the new one with the game rAge on the cover if you go to page43 if you look at the orange box where it says the blueray issue it says (Since Rage is running on powerhouse id tech5 engine, the developeris haveing a tough time squeezing everything oonto standerd DVDs for the pc and 360 releases. “we would love to set the thing up where it filled up one blueray disk compared to 3 dvds, witch is about the right mix, but the game just… we cant cut into a third like that” Carmack says, “we cant cut it int two pecies.weve got two large waistlanda on therewe just couldnt make an arbitrary cout. But Doom 4is beeing set up so that its almost certainly going to be cut upto three dvds versus oneblue-ray. At least the got the ability because the way its structured”) so just in that way it makes the ps3 prob about 10 to 20 % a better system that xbox ontop of that i have had over 5 xboxes since they have came out one of my friends got the ps3 the very firs tay it came out and he has never had any problems so i sold my xbox and bought a ps3 so ima ps3 guy now in my eyes the only thing xbox has better is memory and thats it sorry xbox fans i just ditche you for ps3 and my name is my ps3 name.

By: 2k6

2k6 — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:59:59 +0000

to rocky…your a dumb fuck for saying that people with xbox 360 are poor…360 came out a year before PS3 so duh of course it cost less but that not the point…people want the best value for their money. Obviously everyone can see that 360 have way more mb/gb than PS3 and here go another point PS3 is one year younger so Sony got enough time to be more advance to blase 360 away, but it didn’t happen and Sony actually lost thousand of dollar because of PS3 poor sale.

By: Taylor Lukesh

Taylor Lukesh — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:40:37 +0000

I’m sorry but your facts are favoring the Xbox beacause you didn’t put in the FREE playstation network service or the 160 GB hard drive and there is no way in hell that a system developed before 2005 with just the crappy HDDVD can be better than the state of the art Blue Ray disc that offers way better picture so take the pictures right stop lying to yourself and just admit that the Playstation 3 is better and like they said you just can’t afford one and need a reason to not have one. I have played them both and the 360 seriously sucks.

By: james

james — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:32:00 +0000

PS3 kicks 360’s ass

By: bigdawg

bigdawg — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:00 +0000

I delayed purchasing a third generation (or fifth or sixth depending on who you ask) gaming system until I could afford a nice 1080p plasma TV – now that prices have come down considerably on TVs, I’ve done a lot of research on the Xbox vs. the Playstation 3. I’ve played a lot on the Xbox and the 360 with friends, and have to say it’s a lot of fun, especially with multiple players. However, I’m a lifetime Sony fan, and a big fan of the Metal Gear series so I had to try and be objective and give each system a chance.

One question on the article above…I’m wondering how accurate his screen comparisons are. Considering the first picture, the graphics on the bottom frame are clearly better. More crisp, and more contrast.

Yet he’s got the one which uses the Playstation controller buttons in the main menu Labeled as Xbox 360…was that a one time error? or are all of the comparisons botched?

Seems to me that because you own an Xbox, took a bunch of screens on both systems, and after review realized that the PS3 does indeed have better graphics. So you switched the labels and posted them to make yourself feel better. Or you really just goofed up, lol.

The bottom line is that PS3 is a more powerful graphics platform. However, it is a harder architecture to harness and therefore to develop games for. This has allowed Xbox to take a clear advantage early on. As a result, Sony is taking steps to make it easier to develop for. I expect to see continuous improvement from the PS3 for the next few years, and more of the same from XBox 360. Playstation 3 will have many more milestone games in the next 2-3 years than will Xbox 360. The same phenomenon existed with the Playstation 1-2. Just think of how different the games looked and played at the end of the system’s life than when it first start out. It’s remarkable, really.

I’ve chosen to go with the PS3, because as a late bloomer, I expect to see more improvement and better games arriving on this platform, while the Xbox just pumps out boring rehashes of the same games it’s offered for years now.

For anyone who has played MGS4 and Kill Zone 2 on a 50″ plus plasma in 1080p….you’ll understand why I decided the way I did.

By: warren

warren — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:20:30 +0000

i could see xbox is a winner and much brither than ps3 the visual is superb in 360

By: afghan

afghan — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:09:26 +0000

ps3 is much better

By: tank0fell

tank0fell — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:30:12 +0000

dude u liar,
its clear the playstation 3 has better graphics and games.
Now shut the fuck up stupid little fanboy…